Nucleotide Binding Switches the Information Flow in Ras GTPases

The Ras superfamily comprises many guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) that are essential to intracellular signal transduction. The guanine nucleotide-dependent intrinsic flexibility patterns of five G proteins were investigated in atomic detail through Molecular Dynamics simulations of the GDP- and GTP-bound states (SGDP and SGTP, respectively). For all the considered systems, the intrinsic flexibility of SGDP was higher than that of SGTP, suggesting that Guanine Exchange Factor (GEF) recognition and nucleotide switch require higher amplitude motions than effector recognition or GTP hydrolysis. Functional mode, dynamic domain, and interaction energy correlation analyses highlighted significant differences in the dynamics of small G proteins and Gα proteins, especially in the inactive state. Indeed, SGDP of Gαt, is characterized by a more extensive energy coupling between nucleotide binding site and distal regions involved in GEF recognition compared to small G proteins, which attenuates in the active state. Moreover, mechanically distinct domains implicated in nucleotide switch could be detected in the presence of GDP but not in the presence of GTP. Finally, in small G proteins, functional modes are more detectable in the inactive state than in the active one and involve changes in solvent exposure of two highly conserved amino acids in switches I and II involved in GEF recognition. The average solvent exposure of these amino acids correlates in turn with the rate of GDP release, suggesting for them either direct or indirect roles in the process of nucleotide switch. Collectively, nucleotide binding changes the information flow through the conserved Ras-like domain, where GDP enhances the flexibility of mechanically distinct portions involved in nucleotide switch, and favors long distance allosteric communication (in Gα proteins), compared to GTP

Allosteric activation transitions in enzymes and biomolecular motors: insights from atomistic and coarse-grained simulations

The chemical step in enzymes is usually preceded by a kinetically distinct activation step that involves large-scale conformational transitions. In simple enzymes this step corresponds to the closure of the active site; in more complex enzymes, such as biomolecular motors, the activation step is more complex and may involve interactions with other biomolecules. These activation transitions are essential to the function of enzymes and perturbations in the scale and/or rate of these transitions are implicated in various serious human diseases; incorporating key flexibilities into engineered enzymes is also considered a major remaining challenge in rational enzyme design. Therefore it is important to understand the underlying mechanism of these transitions. This is a significant challenge to both experimental and computational studies because of the allosteric and multi-scale nature of such transitions. Using our recent studies of two enzyme systems, myosin and adenylate kinase (AK), we discuss how atomistic and coarse-grained simulations can be used to provide insights into the mechanism of activation transitions in realistic systems. Collectively, the results suggest that although many allosteric transitions can be viewed as domain displacements mediated by flexible hinges, there are additional complexities and various deviations. For example, although our studies do not find any evidence for cracking in AK, our results do underline the contribution of intra-domain properties (e.g., dihedral flexibility) to the rate of the transition. The study of mechanochemical coupling in myosin highlights that local changes important to chemistry require stabilization from more extensive structural changes; in this sense, more global structural transitions are needed to activate the chemistry in the active site. These discussions further emphasize the importance of better understanding factors that control the degree of co-operativity for allosteric transitions, again hinting at the intimate connection between protein stability and functional flexibility. Finally, a number of topics of considerable future interest are briefly discussed